• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • A2LA Annual Conference
  • Apply for Accreditation
  • Accreditation Estimate Request Form
  • Portal Logins
  • Search Organizations
  • Blog
A2LA logo

A2LA

A Better World Through Accreditation

  • Accreditation
    • ISO/IEC 17025 – Testing/Calibration Laboratories
      • Acoustics and Vibration Testing
      • Biological Testing Accreditation Program
        • Cannabis Testing Laboratory Accreditation
        • A2LA-NIHC Verify Hemp Recognition Program
        • AOAC Laboratory Accreditation Program
        • NAHLN Veterinary Diagnostic Accreditation Program
        • FDA ASCA Pilot Program (Basic Safety And Essential Performance)
        • Threat Agent Testing Laboratory Accreditation Program
        • FDA ASCA Pilot Program (Biocompatibility Testing Of Medical Devices)
        • Laboratory Accreditation for Analyses of Foods – LAAF
      • Calibration Laboratory Accreditation – ISO/IEC 17025
        • State Legal Metrology Accreditation Program
      • Chemical Testing Accreditation Program
        • A2LA Consumer Product Safety Testing – CPSC
        • AOAC Laboratory Accreditation Program
        • NAHLN Veterinary Diagnostic Accreditation Program
        • Competition Animal Drug Testing Laboratory Accreditation Program
        • Cannabis Testing Laboratory Accreditation
        • WADA Testing Accreditation
        • Oregon Toxic-Free Kids Act Accreditation Program
        • Threat Agent Testing Laboratory Accreditation Program
        • A2LA-NIHC Verify Hemp Recognition Program
      • Construction Material Testing Accreditation
        • Harris County, TX/City Of Houston/Houston Port Authority
      • Electrical Testing Accreditation
        • U.S. FCC Equipment Accreditation & Authorization Program
        • CTIA Wireless Association – LTE/CDMA Devices
        • A2LA Consumer Product Safety Testing – CPSC
        • Bluetooth Validation Testing Program
        • EPA ENERGY STAR Accreditation Program
        • NAVAIR
        • Automotive EMC Laboratory Recognition Program – AEMCLRP
        • The A2LA Project 25 Compliance Assessment Program – P25
        • FDA ASCA Pilot Program (Basic Safety And Essential Performance)
        • ISED Certification & Equipment Authorization Program
      • Environmental Testing Accreditation
        • Air Emissions Testing Body Accreditation Program – AETBs
        • California Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program – CA ELAP
        • DOD Advanced Geophysical Classification Accreditation Program – DAGCAP
        • DOD Environmental Laboratory Accreditation – ELAP
        • DOECAP Accreditation & Audit Program
        • Environmental Microbiology Laboratory Accreditation Program – EMLAP
        • EPA National Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program – NLLAP
        • Kentucky Underground Storage Tank Testing Program – UST
        • State Environmental Laboratory Assessment Program – NELAP
        • TNI Field Sampling & Measurement Organization Accreditation Program
        • Wyoming Storage Tank Remediation Program – STR
      • Forensic Examination Accreditation Program
      • Geotechnical Testing Accreditation Program
        • Harris County, TX/City Of Houston/Houston Port Authority
        • Putting Green Laboratory Accreditation Program – PUG
      • Industrial Hygiene Accreditation Program
      • Information Technology Accreditation Program
        • Gaming Standards Association (GSA)
        • Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6)
      • Mechanical Testing Accreditation
        • A2LA Consumer Product Safety Testing – CPSC
        • EPA ENERGY STAR Accreditation Program
        • BIFMA Compliant Accreditation Program
        • Counterfeit Part Avoidance Testing – AS6171
      • Nondestructive Testing Accreditation Program – NDT
      • Sampling & Testing Accreditation
      • Thermal
        • A2LA Consumer Product Safety Testing – CPSC
        • EPA ENERGY STAR Accreditation Program
    • ISO/IEC 17020 – Inspection Bodies
      • ISO/IEC 17020 – Inspection Body Accreditation Program
        • Forensic Examination Accreditation Program
        • IBC Special Inspections Accreditation Program
        • Cybersecurity Inspection Body Program
        • FedRAMP Third-Party Assessment Organizations – 3PAO
        • Field Evaluation Body Accreditation Program (FEB)
        • Notified Body Accreditation Program Under ISO 17065
    • ISO/IEC 17065 – Product Certification Bodies
      • ISO/IEC 17065 Product Compliance Certification Accreditations
        • The A2LA Telecommunication Certification Body Accreditation Program
        • EPA WaterSense Accreditation Certification Program
        • EPA ENERGY STAR Accreditation Program
        • Notified Body Accreditation Program Under ISO 17065
    • ISO/IEC 17043 – Proficiency Testing Providers
      • The A2LA Proficiency Testing Provider Accreditation Program
    • ISO 17034 – Reference Materials Producers
      • ISO 17034 – Reference Materials Producers Accreditation Program
    • ISO 15189 and CLIA – Clinical Testing Laboratories
      • ISO 15189 & CLIA – Clinical Testing Laboratories Accreditation Program
    • ISO 20387 – Biobanking Accreditation Program
      • ISO 20387 – Biobanking Accreditation Program
    • ISO/IEC 17029 – Validation and Verification Accreditation Program
      • ISO/IEC 17029 Validation and Verification Accreditation Program
  • About
    • Overview
    • Board of Directors
    • Careers
    • Leadership
    • Regulators and Specifiers
    • Recognitions
    • Top Customers
  • Resources
    • Acronym Glossary
    • Annual Reports
    • Documents
    • Downloadable Content
    • FAQs
    • Press Releases
    • Accreditation Training Services by A2LA WPT
  • Our Membership Options
  • Get a Quote
  • Online Payment

Key Considerations for the FDA ASCA Program

Home » ISO/IEC 17025 » Key Considerations for the FDA ASCA Program

May 18, 2026 by A2LA

The Accreditation Scheme for Conformity Assessment (ASCA) Program is a voluntary program that was launched in 2020 by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to improve the reliability, consistency, and regulatory confidence in medical device testing performed to FDA-recognized consensus standards. Achieving ASCA accreditation is one of the most effective ways an organization can demonstrate competency and credibility when supporting medical device submissions to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Becoming ASCA-accredited demonstrates an organization’s commitment to quality and technical integrity, while also providing a competitive advantage and expanding opportunities to support regulated medical device testing.

1. Understanding ASCA Accreditation

Accreditation refers to the recognition earned by an organization or, more specifically, a conformity assessment body (CAB), from an authoritative body, such as A2LA, and conveys formal demonstration of its competency to carry out specific conformity assessment tasks such as testing or inspection.

Accreditation bodies (ABs) are recognized by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to conduct assessments of CABs to confirm compliance with the ASCA Program requirements. To become ASCA accredited, laboratories must obtain accreditation from an FDA-recognized ASCA accreditation body. This process includes an assessment against both ISO/IEC 17025:2017 and the additional ASCA Program specifications. Laboratories may hold ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation through an accreditation body but are not considered ASCA-accredited unless the FDA has formally approved their participation in the ASCA Program. A separate application must be submitted to the FDA, and ASCA accreditation is granted only after FDA review and acceptance. It is important to note that ASCA accreditation exists only within the ASCA Program and is separate from any other accreditation an accreditation body may grant for purposes outside the ASCA Program.

NOTE: As directed by the FDA, Accreditation Bodies are not permitted to list FDA ASCA Program verbiage on the Scopes of Accreditation at this time to avoid market confusion.

2. How to Participate in ASCA

Once an organization has made the decision to become ASCA accredited, it is important to become familiar with the applicable standards and program requirements. ASCA assessments evaluate compliance with both ISO/IEC 17025 and the additional ASCA Program specifications established by the FDA.

The ISO/IEC 17025:2017 standard is made up of eight components: Scope, Normative References, Terms and Definitions, General Requirements, Structural Requirements, Resource Requirements, Process Requirements, and Management System Requirements.

The Management Systems Requirements are associated with your laboratory’s management system, whereas the Resource and Process requirements outline the elements that determine the adequacy, correctness, and reliability of the tests or calibrations your laboratory performs. A copy of the ISO/IEC 17025:2017 standard may be purchased from the International Organization for Standardization (ISO).

In addition to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 requirements, laboratories must also comply with ASCA Program specifications. The FDA has released guidance documents that outline the additional requirements laboratories must meet to participate in the ASCA Program. These include:

  • The Accreditation Scheme for Conformity Assessment (ASCA) Pilot Program – Final Guidance
  • Basic Safety and Essential Performance of Medical Electrical Equipment, Medical Electrical Systems, and Laboratory Medical Equipment – Standards Specific Information for the Accreditation Scheme for Conformity Assessment (ASCA) Pilot Program (as applicable)
  • Biocompatibility Testing of Medical Devices- Standards Specific Information for the Accreditation Scheme for Conformity Assessment (ASCA) Pilot Program (as applicable)

NOTE: For testing laboratories including biocompatibility testing methods, compliance with 21 CFR 58 Good Laboratory Practices for Nonclinical Laboratory Studies (GLP) regulations for biocompatibility testing is needed. Please obtain this certificate prior to application. An A2LA assessment that includes the GLP requirements does not equate to the FDA GLP Compliance certificate.

3. Determining Resources Needs

Providing all laboratory staff with a general ISO/IEC 17025:2017 and ASCA Program training course can assist in illustrating how every individual in the organization has a role in the accreditation process. This can be done in-house or through a public venue, and a variety of training options can be found through a simple internet search. Training can be done early in the process to help laboratory personnel gain an understanding of the standard and the overall importance of accreditation. A2LA’s preferred training vendor is A2LA WorkPlace Training.

Regarding the ASCA Program, the FDA hosted educational events and developed CDRH Learn modules, that are publicly available. The materials include the recorded presentation, printable slides, and transcript. For other resources and access to annual reports, please visit the ASCA website.

Testing laboratories interested in ASCA accreditation are encouraged to contact the FDA to discuss the application process, including the required steps and submission content. To arrange a meeting, please email ASCA@fda.hhs.gov.

NOTE: Biocompatibility laboratories may also use this email address to request a copy of the ASCA Pilot Training Companion Document for Biocompatibility Testing. This document provides additional detail on the application process for biocompatibility laboratories.

4. Perform an Internal Audit and Gap Analysis

Per section 8.8 of ISO/IEC 17025:2017, an internal audit must be conducted at planned intervals, and a record of the internal audit must be maintained. This is something that can be conducted prior to your accreditation body assessment by a qualified internal auditor whether it’s a member of the laboratory’s staff or a contracted consultant. The purpose of an internal audit is to determine if your lab is in compliance with the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025:2017, your own management system documentation and regulatory requirements (as applicable). There are no specific internal auditor training requirements specified in the ISO/IEC 17025:2017 standard and external third-party audits do not meet this requirement.

The results of the internal audit should identify any gaps or weaknesses in the laboratory’s system and determine if additional resources are needed to ensure compliance. It is essential to keep sufficient records of the internal audit results and any follow-up actions taken. The outcome of the internal audit may help determine if the laboratory is, in fact, ready for an external assessment, or if additional work is needed before applying for accreditation.

A gap analysis is a valuable tool for organizations seeking compliance with specific program requirements such as the FDA ASCA Program. By comparing current practices with program expectations, including ISO/IEC 17025:2017 compliance, documentation, and testing scope, it identifies potential nonconformances, supports corrective action planning, and improves readiness for ASCA Accreditation, reducing the risk of nonconformities during formal assessments.

5. Conduct a Management Review

Per section 8.9 of ISO/IEC 17025:2017, the lab must complete a management review at planned intervals to ensure continued suitability and identify areas for improvement. The management review is typically conducted by the testing laboratory’s top management, which has the authority and resources necessary to make changes based on the inputs (e.g. suitability of polices, corrective actions, complaints, feedback, etc.) that are identified in section 8.9.2 of the standard. The lab will determine who these individuals are, but they are typically those in leadership positions such as President, Quality Manager, Technical Manager, etc. The outputs of the management review laid out in 8.9.3, ensures that actions for improvements and need for change amongst other requirements are noted, as applicable.

Although this is not a specific requirement for the ASCA Program, it may present an opportunity to incorporate areas of ASCA related activities into the management review process to ensure the continued suitability of policies, procedures, and resources, as well as to identify areas for improvement.

6. Evaluate Accreditation Bodies

Next steps are to research, evaluate, and select an accreditation body (AB). An ASCA assessment can only be conducted through an ASCA‑recognized accreditation body. There is a current list of recognized accreditation bodies available on the FDA’s website. The list includes the accreditation bodies, along with their recognized scopes and the dates on which recognition was granted. Requirements for recognition include being a signatory to the International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC) Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA), as well as having the ability to assess to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 and the applicable ASCA‑specific requirements.

A2LA is among the largest accreditation bodies in the world and the only independent, 501(c)3, non-profit, internationally recognized-accreditation body in the United States. With more than 4,000 actively accredited certificates, A2LA has accredited certificates in all 50 US states and more than 50 countries.

7. Apply for accreditation

After selecting an accreditation body, it is encouraged to ask specific questions related to their accreditation process. Each accrediting body’s processes may vary, and it is important to become familiar with the organization, its staff, and any additional requirements beyond ISO/IEC 17025 and ASCA. Accreditation bodies can also provide valuable support throughout the accreditation process.

Upon receipt of the final scope and certificate of accreditation from the selected accrediting body, the testing laboratory may proceed with applying to the FDA ASCA Program. Refer to the two-step application process for additional information.

8. Maintain your ASCA Accreditation

At the time ASCA accreditation is granted, the FDA assigns an expiration date. ASCA accredited testing laboratories are responsible for ensuring their required onsite assessments are completed by the accrediting body in a timely manner. The accrediting body maintains the ISO/IEC 17025:2017 scope and certificate of accreditation.

After reading through the FDA ASCA page and relevant guides, if you have additional questions, please email ASCA@fda.hwhs.gov. This email address is also used to submit documents associated with ASCA accreditation applications and maintenance, as well as to report issues.

NOTE: The FDA does not charge a fee for testing laboratories to participate in the ASCA Program.

Ready to start earning your ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation? Contact A2LA for a free estimate request: A2LA.org/estimate-request.

Food & Pharmaceutical,  ISO/IEC 17025 17025,  A2LA,  accreditation,  accreditation body

Footer

Headquarters 5202 Presidents Court, Ste 220
Frederick, MD 21703
301.644.3248
info@A2LA.org
Second Location 5755 Central Avenue, Ste 201
Boulder, CO 80301
Social Icon
Social Icon
  • Careers
  • Contact A2LA
  • Lodging a Complaint
  • Get Involved
  • Privacy Agreement
  • Online Payment
  • A2LA Annual Conference
  • Apply for Accreditation
  • Accreditation Estimate Request Form
  • Portal Logins
  • Search Organizations
  • Blog

© 2026 A2LA · Powered by Orases Custom Software · Website Privacy Policy & Terms of Use