• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • A2LA Annual Conference
  • Apply
  • Blog
  • Accreditation Estimate Request Form
  • Portal
  • Search Organizations
A2LA logo

A2LA

A Better World Through Accreditation

  • Accreditation
    • ISO/IEC 17025 – Testing/Calibration Laboratories
      • Acoustics and Vibration Testing
      • Biological Testing Accreditation Program
        • Cannabis Testing Laboratory Accreditation
        • A2LA-NIHC Verify Hemp/Cannabis Recognition Program
        • AOAC Laboratory Accreditation Program
        • NAHLN Veterinary Diagnostic Accreditation Program
        • FDA ASCA Pilot Program (Basic Safety And Essential Performance)
        • Threat Agent Testing Laboratory Accreditation Program
        • FDA ASCA Pilot Program (Biocompatibility Testing Of Medical Devices)
        • Laboratory Accreditation for Analyses of Foods (LAAF)
      • Chemical Testing
        • NAHLN Veterinary Diagnostic Accreditation Program
        • Competition Animal Drug Testing Laboratory Accreditation Program
        • AOAC Laboratory Accreditation Program
        • A2LA Consumer Product Safety Testing (CPSC)
        • Cannabis Testing Laboratory Accreditation
        • A2LA-NIHC Verify Hemp/Cannabis Recognition Program
        • WADA Testing Accreditation
        • Oregon Toxic-Free Kids Act Accreditation Program
        • Threat Agent Testing Laboratory Accreditation Program
      • Construction Material Testing Accreditation
        • Harris County, TX/City Of Houston/Houston Port Authority
      • Electrical Testing Accreditation
        • U.S. FCC Equipment Accreditation & Authorization Program
        • CTIA Wireless Association – LTE/CDMA Devices
        • A2LA Consumer Product Safety Testing (CPSC)
        • Bluetooth Validation Testing Program
        • EPA ENERGY STAR Accreditation Program
        • NAVAIR
        • Automotive EMC Laboratory Recognition Program (AEMCLRP)
        • The A2LA Project 25 Compliance Assessment Program (P25)
        • FDA ASCA Pilot Program (Basic Safety And Essential Performance)
        • ISED Certification & Equipment Authorization Program
      • Environmental Testing Accreditation
        • CA ELAP Laboratory Accreditation Program
        • EPA National Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program (NLLAP)
        • Kentucky Underground Storage Tank (UST) Testing Program
        • DOECAP Accreditation & Audit Program
        • DOD Environmental Laboratory Accreditation (ELAP)
        • TNI Field Sampling & Measurement Organization Accreditation Program
        • Air Emissions Testing Body Accreditation Program (AETBs)
        • DOD Advanced Geophysical Classification Accreditation Program (DAGCAP)
        • Wyoming Storage Tank Remediation (STR) Program
        • State Environmental Laboratory Assessment Program – NELAP
      • Forensic Examination Accreditation Program
      • Geotechnical Testing Accreditation Program
        • Harris County, TX/City Of Houston/Houston Port Authority
        • Putting Green Laboratory Accreditation Program (PUG)
      • Information Technology Accreditation Program
        • Gaming Standards Association (GSA)
        • Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6)
      • ISO/IEC 17025 Calibration Laboratory Accreditation
      • Mechanical Testing Accreditation
        • A2LA Consumer Product Safety Testing (CPSC)
        • EPA ENERGY STAR Accreditation Program
        • BIFMA Compliant Accreditation Program
        • Counterfeit Part Avoidance Testing (AS6171)
      • Nondestructive Testing Accreditation Program – NDT
      • Sampling & Testing Accreditation
      • Sustainable Energy Testing
        • EPA ENERGY STAR Accreditation Program
      • Thermal
        • A2LA Consumer Product Safety Testing (CPSC)
        • EPA ENERGY STAR Accreditation Program
    • ISO/IEC 17020 – Inspection Bodies
      • ISO/IEC 17020 – Inspection Body Accreditation Program
        • Forensic Examination Accreditation Program
        • IBC Special Inspections Accreditation Program
        • Cybersecurity Inspection Body Program
        • FedRAMP Third-Party Assessment Organizations (3PAO)
        • Field Evaluation Body Accreditation Program (FEB)
        • Notified Body Accreditation Program Under ISO 17065
    • ISO/IEC 17065 – Product Certification Bodies
      • ISO/IEC 17065 Product Compliance Certification Accreditations
        • The A2LA Telecommunication Certification Body Accreditation Program
        • EPA WaterSense Accreditation Certification Program
        • EPA ENERGY STAR Accreditation Program
        • Notified Body Accreditation Program Under ISO 17065
    • ISO/IEC 17043 – Proficiency Testing Providers
      • The A2LA Proficiency Testing Provider Accreditation Program
    • ISO 17034 – Reference Materials Producers
      • ISO 17034 – Reference Materials Producers Accreditation Program
    • ISO 15189 and CLIA – Clinical Testing Laboratories
      • ISO 15189 & CLIA – Clinical Testing Laboratories Accreditation Program
    • ISO 20387 – Biobanking Accreditation Program
      • ISO 20387 – Biobanking Accreditation Program
  • About
    • Overview
    • Board of Directors
    • Careers
    • Leadership
    • Regulators and Specifiers
    • Recognitions
    • Top Customers
  • Resources
    • Acronym Glossary
    • Annual Reports
    • Documents
    • Downloadable Content
    • FAQs
    • Press Releases
    • Accreditation Training Services by A2LA WPT
  • Our Membership Options
  • Get a Quote
  • Online Payment

Explaining ISO/IEC 17025 Competency Requirements

Home » ISO/IEC 17025 » Explaining ISO/IEC 17025 Competency Requirements

December 3, 2024 by A2LA

Accreditation proves an organization’s ability to perform work competently, which is why ISO/IEC 17025 places a heavy emphasis on personnel competency within section 6.2. This section of the standard contains several requirements—mainly covered in clauses 6.2.2 and 6.2.5—and it is one of the top ten areas in which A2LA cites nonconformities.

While clauses 6.2.2 and 6.2.5 are not inherently difficult to address, there are a few areas to consider when implementing these clauses into your management system. Requirements can and do fall through the cracks. In this document, we will cover the intent of each clause, and a few tips on how to address them.

ISO/IEC Clause 6.2.2

ISO/IEC 17025 clause 6.2.2 states:
“The laboratory shall document the competence requirements for each function influencing the results of laboratory activities, including requirements for education, qualification, training, technical knowledge, skills and experience.”

To better understand what this clause requires, it helps to think about a job posting. Your typical job posting will have the requirements you expect the prospective employee to bring to the table. On the same note, the ISO/IEC 17025 standard is asking you to put together a “job posting” for positions in your organization. These competency requirements should be documented and controlled within your quality management system. Typically, labs will put together a document that lists the job descriptions of each position in order to meet this requirement. A description of each competency requirement is listed below:

Note that not every position will require all of the above. An entry level position may require 0 years of experience. However, the competence requirement should still be addressed within your document.

  • Technicians (e.g. performing the laboratory activities)
  • Internal Auditor (e.g. confirming the compliance to requirements)
  • Quality Manager (e.g. managing the quality system and ensuring consistent application)
  • Sales (e.g. responsible for contract review)
  • Shipping and receiving (e.g. responsible for handling test and calibration items)

In summary, as you document competence requirements, ensure you are considering all functions that affect laboratory activities with respect to the ISO/IEC 17025 standard.

ISO/IEC Clause 6.2.5

ISO/IEC 17025 clause 6.2.5 states:
“The laboratory shall have procedure(s) and retain records for: a) determining the competence requirements; b) selection of personnel; c) training of personnel; d) supervision of personnel; e) authorization of personnel; f) monitoring competence of personnel.”

This clause carries significant weight. Not only are there six separate requirements listed, but you must also have both procedure(s) and records for each area. As we break down each of these items, keep in mind the following:

  1. ISO/IEC 17025 only requires you (per clause ISO/IEC17025 5.5.c) to “document your procedures to the extent necessary to ensure consistent application.” Avoid overthinking your procedures!
  2. It is up to you whether you want a single procedure or multiple procedures to address these requirements. The requirements naturally flow into themselves, and as such, most organizations opt for a single procedure.
  3. Records can be checklists, spreadsheets, forms, workflows, etc. The standard gives you a baseline requirement and you make it work for your laboratory.

a) Determining the Competence Requirements

For this requirement, the standard is asking you to explain your process for putting together the competence requirements for each position related to your laboratory activities. To put it into perspective, if you were creating a new position for your organization, how would you go about determining the competence requirements per 6.2.2.? Would your HR department be responsible for that? Would you gather in a room and brainstorm? Whatever the process is, write it down. It can be as vague or detailed as you want. As long as it is consistently applied you are meeting the intent of the standard.

b) Selection of Personnel

Having your competence requirements determined makes the “selection of personnel” piece of the standard relatively straightforward. The competence requirements are the main aspect for determining whether an individual is hired into a position. That being said, there may be other areas outside of the competence requirements that you may want to consider, and that would be acceptable to include within your procedure.

c) Training of Personnel

Once personnel are selected, training is initiated. The standard does not specify what the training should entail. As such, it will be up to you to determine this.

The training may vary depending on the position. If you are hiring for a shipping and receiving clerk, the training could be very different than an individual responsible for calibrating equipment; however, both personnel will be expected to be competent in the relevant procedures and processes that affect the respective areas of the standard. The training program shall be robust enough to ensure that personnel are adequately trained to perform the work that could affect the laboratory activities.

d) Supervision of Personnel

During or after the training process, you may require supervision of your personnel prior to them performing the work on their own. If this is the case, you will need to document the process for supervising personnel. This may include aspects such as the length of oversight, what activities are supervised, and how this supervision is recorded. If you deem that the activity is low risk and therefore does not require supervision, be sure to still address supervision within your procedure.

e) Authorization of Personnel

Once personnel are deemed competent, they are authorized to perform the work they have been assigned without oversight. Within your procedure, you will specify what steps need to be taken to reach this point. For example, authorization may occur after 1 month of training and 2 weeks of supervision, or it may occur after 10 consecutive successful runs of a test.

Note: ISO/IEC 17025 6.2.6 has requirements for what personnel shall be authorized for.

f) Monitoring Competence of Personnel

As with several other areas of the standard, competency of personnel is not a “one and done” situation. Mistakes happen, procedures are forgotten, and as a result, consistency is lost over time. As such, ISO/IEC 17025 requires the competence of personnel to be monitored. It is up to the laboratory to determine how and when this occurs. For example, you may decide that this is done on an annual basis and through an annual training. Or, given the high risk surrounding your work, you may opt to monitor your personnel on a quarterly basis and utilize techniques such as peer evaluation, participation in proficiency testing, and supervision from upper-level management to monitor competence. Keep in mind that monitoring can vary between types of testing/calibration. Once the monitoring process is determined, document it in a procedure.

For items a-f, the records should reflect that you followed your process. If you fill out a training form to show that an internal auditor is authorized to perform internal audits, expect that record to be requested during an external audit.

The explanations given above may provide you with additional information to tackle the requirements of section 6.2.

Have more questions? Contact our Customer Care Team at info@A2LA.org or give them a call at 301-644-3248.

ISO/IEC 17025 A2LA,  Accrediation,  accreditation body,  calibration,  ISO/IEC 17025,  laboratory accreditation,  third-party accreditation body

Footer

Headquarters 5202 Presidents Court, Ste 220
Frederick, MD 21703
301.644.3248
info@A2LA.org
Social Icon
  • Careers
  • Contact A2LA
  • Lodging a Complaint
  • Get Involved
  • Privacy Agreement
  • Online Payment
  • A2LA Annual Conference
  • Apply
  • Blog
  • Accreditation Estimate Request Form
  • Portal
  • Search Organizations

© 2025 A2LA · Powered by Orases Custom Software · Website Privacy Policy & Terms of Use